Friday, January 18, 2008

WWJD--What Would Job Do? (In a Modern Era of Prosperity Preaching)

by Eric Walters

Most of us are generally familiar with the biblical story of Job. After being declared “upright” by God, he nevertheless was subjected to enormous suffering and devastation. His children killed, his fortune lost, his health failing, and his hope challenged.

The friends of Job—Eliphaz, Bildad, and Zophar, try to understand and interpret the cause of his suffering. Believing that Job’s suffering is linked directly to some hidden sin, Eliphaz challenged Job to find out what sin had caused all of the trouble—because the prevailing wisdom was that righteous people do not suffer; Bildad reinforced the claim of Eliphaz and argued that Job should repent. Adding insult to injury, Zophar concurred and reasoned that Job should correct his impure thinking about God and justice. All of his friends (or the antagonists of Job) believed that his suffering was a consequence of his sin. They offered long diatribes and prescriptions to alleviate his suffering, and they sounded logical and true. But despite this, Job’s wife recommended that he just cut to the chase: curse God and die so that his suffering would end.

If Job were a modern Christian looking for answers to his predicament, I suspect that his modern day counselors—the Eliphazes, Bildads, and Zophars--would most likely be found on the NY Times Bestseller list, at Christian bookstores, on the Internet, and on cable networks. Who might play the role of Eliphaz, Bildad, and Zophar and what would be their prescription for relieving the suffering?

For starters, Joel Osteen would tell him to think about getting Your Best Life Now, and by doing this he would be on his way to Becom[ing] a Better You ; Creflow Dollar would preach that the secret is to Change Your Thinking, Change Your Life [to] Unlock [his] Full Potential for Success and Achievement (Taffi would echo and add that Job invest in Your Spiritual Makeover). Joyce Meyer would be there to tell Job that his predicament is overcome on the Battlefield of the Mind, and victory will give him Conflict Free Living. And of course, there are multiple interlopers and opportunists who would kindly encourage Job to commit just 40 days to discover a Purpose Driven Life, and a myriad of other "essential resources" for his spiritual growth.

On a serious note, all of these counselors and “friends”—both ancient and modern--, tend to opt for the easy equation that links the circumstances of our life to what we think and do. Unfortunately, it’s a subtle reinforcement of an old problem that originates in the Garden: that man can interpret and determine his destiny. And in a modern consumer-driven culture, the quest for the Christian panacea has become a lucrative business opportunity whose payoff is much better than real estate!

To be sure, the success-oriented intentions of contemporary Eliphaz, Bildad, and Zophar “ministries” adopt biblical principles, but the irony is that their message has only elements of truth. Indeed, how and what we think can significantly affect our lives. But sounding biblical is not always synonymous with biblical soundness, and the propensity of the Christian success gurus to decontextualize entire passages of scripture to support their unbalanced agenda is shameful. It is an egregious abuse of preacher’s license and the trust of the people: although their teaching embraces tidbits of truth, the overall message is not truthful.

It is here where promulgating half-truths becomes more destructive than outright lies. More than ever, we must be careful that the virtues of love, joy, peace, longsuffering, patience and other fruits of a mature Christian experience are not conveniently sacrificed at the altar of personal success and happiness. Unfortunately, when this happens, our understanding and worship of God is distorted, authentic ministry vocation becomes confused, and our relationships with others are trivialized and jeopardized. (I keep searching for that scripture passage in the Gospels where Jesus declares to his disciples, “Hey boys! Aren’t we having our best life now?”)

But there is always hope. Another one of Job’s friends, Elihu, appeared later in the story (chapter 32). After all the counselors (antagonists) had offered their shallow diatribes, Elihu reminded Job that the breadth of God’s work throughout eternity is not easily understood by the simplicity of man’s thinking. Psalm 73 describes how Asaph too, found meaning in his suffering after he entered the temple, where he received counsel from God. Job and Asaph grew in character and wisdom because of suffering that was God-ordained. They realized that God cannot be reduced to obey our guttural temptations and desires for security and creature comforts. Both came to accept that the faithful endure trials and sufferings that defy easy explanation and simple calculation.

A final note for all who may have forgotten, and will be tempted to forget: the balance and totality of our life rests in the counsel, will, and hands of God—not in our own minds.

Now that’s blessed assurance of the highest order.


Eric Walters is Co-Founder of TheoSyst Group.

9 comments:

Blackwatch said...

Excellent analysis Bro. Walters. Question, to acquiesce that the faithful endure trails and triumphs at the hand of God, where in this equation do we fit the free will of humanity and the consequences of that free will?

Anonymous said...

Good analysis indeed. I think Job is the best example of how contemporary Christians, too, make the mistake of thinking we can know God definitively. Surely, we can know God intimately, as elements of God exists within us all. But to assume that we can know God to the point of controlling how things happen and/or when they happen is an error being perpetuated by "spiritual leaders." The consequences are indeed grande. If we follow that logic--that things happen because we aren't faithful enough or focused enough or believe enough--negates not only the reality that we have limited control over all things godly. It also disregards as irrelevant all the real things that inhibit progress, success, mobility, etc. It's a tremendous flaw that has led us nowhere.

Anonymous said...

Thanks for the great question, blackwatch (also, thank you Dana). I think we start by understanding and accepting our limited ability to "interpret cause and outcome" in real time. Only God can do this. Take for example, the consequence of driving thru a redlight. Possible outcomes:
1. You get away with the offense.
2. You get "caught" by the police or camera(I live in DC and Maryland) and ticketed.
3. You get thru the light, but (unbeknownst to you)you cause an accident in the process.

All outcomes involve free will and choice, whose outcome may be "Whew!" or "Wham!". Depending on which outcome, one may state that "bad things happen to innocent people all the time" or that "folks who break the law do not get punished." This is a reflection of Job and Asaph.

Now this raises the question of whether God gets intimately and personally involved in the affairs of humans (that's the Deistic/Deism viewpoint), or does he simply create us, and leave us down here to work things out at the Trascendent, impersonal Force (that's the Theistic/Theism viewpoint)?

As Christians we are theists, but our inability to know "what God is up to at all times" is both frustrating and liberating.

As I bring this to a close, I would recommend that we all carefully read the book of Ecclesiastes--particularly chapter 3. Verses 10-11 say this: "I have seen the burden God has laid on men. 11 He has made everything beautiful in its time. He has also set eternity in the hearts of men; yet they cannot fathom what God has done from beginning to end."

In the end, we must seek to do what is right in the sight of God; and our motives for the choices we make--whether selfish or selfless, are under the perview of God.

The real equation must result in humility.

Anonymous said...

Good stuff here, Eric! Thank you!

You nail this one, in terms of the much-needed critique of the prosperity scene. In recent sermons and presentations, I have critiqued them as well. This critical voice needs to grow! But here is a missing element in your analysis. You correctly point to the theological bind of our inability to interpret or determine our DESTINY. That is in God's hands alone. I agree with that, and I believe our task is to pursue that DESTINY with all our hearts.

But you suggest that the Prosperity Preachers (PPs) are in pursuit of DESTINY with their abiding emphasis on finding "YOUR" best life, or YOUR payday, or YOUR due season (whatever label you choose to place on the PP's "Holy Grail"). The problem is, while it is indeed true that we can't determine our destiny, you are giving the PPs far too much credit by suggesting that this is their aim! They are NOT nearly that noble. They are not focused on determining or controlling DESTINY at all, but rather DESTINATION (and the difference is neither trivial, nor semantic). The PPs have a truly shallow theology that does not even begin to touch the profundity of the Religion of Jesus. JESUS was about DESTINY, NOT DESTINATION!! So is God.

In contrast, these PPs think that your best life is a well-appointed life, and you need to get PAID sooner rather than later -- because the worst thing that can happen to you is to die poor in material. What they miss is that your best life is a well-annointed life, and the worst thing that can happen to you is to die poor in SPIRIT. DESTINY is about SPIRIT, or Heaven's treasure! Destination is about material, or earthly treasure. The PPs are fundamentally demonic as they distort, stunt, and bastardize the Truth of Jesus. They are bewitching and entertaining pimps. And that can only mean that those who sit at their feet are bewitched and entertained prostitutes! See.

Anonymous said...

Blackwatch:

I should note a correction in the previous post:

Deism: God creates, leaves us alone (to work things out), and remains Transcendent. This is Thomas Aquinas' "blind watchmaker" theory (some may want to Google or Wiki this term)

Theism: God is intimately involved in God's creation (we also can call this Immanence, which is derived from the Latin in manere "to remain within").

Sorry for the error (next time I won't answer the phone when responding to your question).

eric

Anonymous said...

John:

Thanks for extending the analysis of the PP culture. I think there is much to say regarding the larger Christian diaspora in America.

The Prosperity culture seeks to fill a void in the lives of many folks out there who are trying to find their way.

Clearly, SOME needs are being met by the Prosperity culture, but I agree with your assertions (but perhaps with not as much intensity). (OK--call me a softy!)

Thanks for the distinctions between Destiny and Destinations: good stuff (you ought to be a preacher!)

What I'd like for all of us to consider are the damaging psychodynamics that manifest within the church, because of the PP phenom.

Ron S. said...

Dr Walters:



There are several threads one could comment on, such as the company we keep, who we call friends, how God speaks, how we receive his messages and perceive their meanings, whose counsel we keep, etc; but my comment only addresses how unfathomable God is and how a strong faith must be the anchor in the hard times and the good.



One could easily reason that as upright persons and believers, we are walking in God's favor and are considered worthy of his blessings and mercy. No less so for Job, and perhaps more so.



As a matter of fact, I am certain that God has poured abundant favor upon us all. So when I visit the story of Job I am reminded of his prior steadfast zeal for God's Word despite later hardship after hardship, test after test.



Yet I find it tough to reconcile "God-ordained suffering" against what otherwise can be considered the work that Satan would do. Though God does what God does, it opens up the notion that one should expect other than only good from God, notwithstanding all the other benefits----that even as God extends mercy, blessings and grace, and more we must add suffering!!!!


Please get me on the right track and help my understanding here.

Blessings

Ron

Anonymous said...

Hi Ron:
Thanks for chiming in on the discussion. I think your question sits at the heart of biblical interpretation (or biblical criticism). I’ll try to be brief without being too technical on the theological side.

One question we've got to ask is how each of us approaches the bible. Job, along with the book of Ecclesiastes, was one of those hotly debated books/writings when it came to establishing the biblical canon (which books would be included in the bible). The reason for the debate was whether God commissioned suffering of Job (or the "vanity" that is written of in Ecclesiastes).

Why the debate? Well, if one believes that God controls all things, then God has the power to control the circumstances that affect our lives. so one question that arose in ancient times was: "why do people suffer when they seemingly are trying to do what's right in the sight of God?" Job is an attempt to answer that question, with the understanding that God is ULTIMATELY controlling all things (this is the Theistic argument--see my answer to blackwatch).

But some things in life are difficult to understand and comprehend if God is ultimately in control. Why are children stricken with disease? Why do seemingly "good people" suffer, when overtly "irreligious, evil" people live happy and successful lives? This is the Psalm (73) of Asaph.

But let's go further. If we believe that God is ultimately in control, then do we "blame" God for natural disasters like a Tsunami that kills 200,000+ people? Is this "just" nature? What about 9-11? How do we interpret it: some said it was God’s judgment, others said it had nothing to do with God, but for some reason, “God allowed it” to happen. Theistic or Deistic argument (see my post to blackwatch above)?

So we see what the biblical writer is faced with: an all-seeing, omnipotent God, who cares for us--and yet tragedies befall the "chosen" of God. How to make sense of it all?

We see this dilemma in Romans 9, where Paul has determined that God can do what God chooses:

"14What then shall we say? Is God unjust? Not at all! 15For he says to Moses,
"I will have mercy on whom I have mercy,
and I will have compassion on whom I have compassion."[f] 16It does not, therefore, depend on man's desire or effort, but on God's mercy. 17For the Scripture says to Pharaoh: "I raised you up for this very purpose, that I might display my power in you and that my name might be proclaimed in all the earth."[g] 18Therefore God has mercy on whom he wants to have mercy, and he hardens whom he wants to harden.

19One of you will say to me: "Then why does God still blame us? For who resists his will?" 20But who are you, O man, to talk back to God? "Shall what is formed say to him who formed it, 'Why did you make me like this?' "[h] 21Does not the potter have the right to make out of the same lump of clay some pottery for noble purposes and some for common use?

22What if God, choosing to show his wrath and make his power known, bore with great patience the objects of his wrath—prepared for destruction?"

This is a very uncomfortable passage for many--but for the sake of Paul's diatribe to the church at Rome, he adopts this theological orientation to argue for the supreme will of God--that no creature can ultimately dictate or even understand the ultimate purpose of God's action in the world. The context of the passage is extremely important here.

The sovereignty of God and what it looks like in the world, is a debate within the theological community, but more importantly, within our own hearts. How do we see God? Is he loving and caring? I say yes, indeed. Should God have the "right" to do what God chooses to do, for God's own glory? I say yes, indeed.

That's why faith is always kinda "incomplete and yet complete". We will continue to desire to know God, in all of God's glory--until we meet face to face.

Job keeps reminding us that we are creatures who need the mercy of God, but not just in our suffering; we need God’s mercy in our moments of joy and comfort. Job reminds us that God has always been there; the real question is, "Will we yet honor God (instead of attempting to understand God) in both joy and suffering?"

Thanks again for your comments.

Ron S. said...

Thanks Doc, for a very fine response. I look forward to reading more and becoming more enlightened.

Ron S.